On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 23:12:53 -0500 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +Modifying a Unionfs branch directly, while the union is mounted, is > +currently unsupported. Does this mean that if I have /a/b/ and /c/d/ unionised under /mnt/union, I am not allowed to alter anything under /a/b/ and /c/d/? That I may only alter stuff under /mnt/union? If so, that sounds like a significant limitation. > Any such change can cause Unionfs to oops, or stay > silent and even RESULT IN DATA LOSS. With a rather rough user interface ;) Also, is it possible to add new branches to an existing union mount? And to take old ones away? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
