On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:17:17PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > I am really bad with names :( I tried using the _wq suffixes earlier and > that seemed confusing to some, but if no one else objects I'm happy to use > that. I thought aio_lock_page() might be misleading because it is > synchronous if a regular wait queue entry is passed in, but again it may not > be too bad. > > What's your preference ? Does anything more intuitive come to mind ? Beein bad about naming seems to be a disease, at least I suffer from it aswell. I wouldn't mind either the _wq or aio_ naming - _wq describes the way it's called and aio_ describes it's a special case for aio. Similarly to how ->aio_read/->aio_write can be used for synchronous I/O aswell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
