On Dec 4 2006 07:31, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: If the makefile contains >--- a/fs/unionfs/Makefile >+++ b/fs/unionfs/Makefile >@@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNION_FS) += unionfs.o > unionfs-y := subr.o dentry.o file.o inode.o main.o super.o \ > stale_inode.o branchman.o rdstate.o copyup.o dirhelper.o \ > rename.o unlink.o lookup.o commonfops.o dirfops.o sioq.o >+ >+unionfs-$(CONFIG_UNION_FS_XATTR) += xattr.o then you don't need >--- a/fs/unionfs/copyup.c >+++ b/fs/unionfs/copyup.c >@@ -18,6 +18,75 @@ > > #include "union.h" > >+#ifdef CONFIG_UNION_FS_XATTR ^^ this, do you?. >+#include "union.h" >+ >+/* This is lifted from fs/xattr.c */ >+void *xattr_alloc(size_t size, size_t limit) Same as for init_inode_cache, possibly prefix with unionfs. -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html