Re: openg and path_to_handle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:53:39AM -0600, Rob Ross wrote:
David Chinner wrote:
Does anyone here know about the XFS libhandle API? This has been
around for years and it does _exactly_ what these proposed syscalls
are supposed to do (and more).
Thanks for pointing these out Dave. These are indeed along the same lines as the openg()/openfh() approach.

One difference is that they appear to perform permission checking on the open_by_handle(), which means that the entire path needs to be encoded in the handle, and makes it difficult to eliminate the path traversal overhead on N open_by_handle() operations.

Another (and highly important) difference is that usage is restricted to
root:

xfs_open_by_handle(...)
...
        if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
		return -XFS_ERROR(EPERM);

I assume that this is because the implementation chose not to do the path encoding in the handle? Because if they did, they could do full path permission checking as part of the open_by_handle.

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux