On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > Here's an updated (but untested) patch based on your suggestions. I also went > ahead and made the exported symbols GPL-only since that seems like it would be > appropriate here. Any further thoughts on it? I don't know that this is a good idea. I know this isn't likely to be a popular statement, but I think that there should be at least some minor justification to making a symbol GPL-only (it won't take much). This seems like exactly the sort of thing that should be a generic service available to all filesystem implementors whether it's GPL or not. The usual justification for GPL-only is that it's something random modules shouldn't be touching anyway, but it's something that some part of the tree which could be a module needs. Brad Boyer flar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
