On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 16:50 +0800, guomingyang wrote: > > I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in namei.c and dir.c. Why? They are all file logical blocks, ext4_fsblk_t is for on disk blocks. Takashi Sato has a patch to define all file logical blocks as ext3_fileblk_t, it did not make to mainline before ext4 was forked. Probably we should bring the to ext3/4 to clarify the confusions. Mingming > Thank you to anyone who offer help > >Hello everyone: > > > > I am a student interesting in linux filesystem, I have a problem about the replace of block number type to ext4_fsblk_t. Is it complete? Or has it passed all the test? Because I have found a place like this in linux-2.6.19-rc2/fs/ext4/inode.c > > > > > > > >+struct buffer_head *ext4_bread(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > >+ int block, int create, int *err) > > > > > >the block's type is not changed. Although I think it will bring no mistake, I doubt about why not change it. Thank you ! > > > > > >guomingyang > > > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > guomingyang > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
