On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 09:01 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > Wouldn't you only be able to only crack a few of the low-order bits due > to a cluster of inodes being sequential? I don't think you'd be able > crack enough of it to be useful. You may be able to determine where > some inodes are relative to others, but I don't think you'd be able to > point the their location in memory. I don't know anything about crypto, > so I could be wrong. > On a 64-bit kernel, that would be the case. On a 32-bit kernel, there are no high order bits to chop off, so this would effectively give you the address. -- Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
