Re: Allocation strategy - dynamic zone for small files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> At the filesystem summit we DID find a surprising number of small files
> even when the whole system was examined.  We discussed storing small
> files directly in the inode along with other EAs (this would require
> larger inodes).  This improves data locality and performance (i.e. stat
> of the file loads the small file data into cache), though the assumption
> is that there will be an increasing number of EAs on files in the future.

So it won't be feasible to store EAs + small file in the inode, or in the
future it won't be feasible to store just EAs in the inode for most files?

Are there any stats showing the current amount/size of EAs per file, and
what it is expected to be in the future?

Phillip


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux