On Tue, 7 November 2006 14:41:04 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > How about this patch instead here? I don't think anything depends on > i_ino being any certain value for these files, and this seems less > "magic-numbery". This should also mostly prevent us from assigning out > i_ino=0. nfsctl_transaction_write() appears to depend on i_ino. Jörn -- Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent. -- Sun Tzu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
