Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:15:27PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> I agree with the conclusion, but the patch is incomplete. You went down >>> all the way to find out what the fileystems do in this messages, so add >>> the hunks to override the defaults for non-standard filesystems to the >>> patch aswell to restore the pre-inode diet state. >> Well, agreed. I put 80% or more back to pre-patch state, but not all. >> :) So it's less broken with my patch than without, so at least it's >> moving forward. So... Ted's patches get in w/o fixing up all the other >> filesystems (left as an exercise to the patch reader) but mine can't? :) > > It's because no reviwer noticed the breakage Ted put in ;-) I think if > you really refused to do the remaining 20% we can try to pressured Ted to > do it and if that doesn't work I'll just do it myself because I'll be > tired of arguing at that point.. eh, I'll sign up to do it when I get a moment, I won't refuse :) Just had to notice that 2 patches already went in without the requirement to "fix everything else" :) It would be nice to get the "fix most of it" patch in sooner than later, though. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
