Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 & fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-) On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Holden Karau" <holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all > that]. Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT. And the your patch didn't make performance better, right? -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- Cell: 613-276-1645 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
