On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:25:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I see. So you mean that in our ext3meta filesystem we'd have a file > named "add_this_extent_to_inode" and a file "reloc_inode_interval" and > they'd be fed essentially the same info as the current ioctl interface and > do the same thing as we currently do. Hmm, I don't find it that nice any > more but yes, this would work. It depends on the operation. ext2meta[1] works fine for online defrag, just exporting metadata objects and providing read(1) and write(2) operations on them. Adding 'trigger' files (like your add_this_extent_to_inode) may make sense for some operations, indeed, but we need to see the whole picture before really understanding whether that interface is optimal. Jeff [1] http://linux.yyz.us/misc/ext2meta.c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
