Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] O_DIRECT locking rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Here is a new cut of my O_DIRECT locking rework.  It has a much lower
cpu cost than the last set, and simple benchmarks no longer show a
regression here in system time.  But, the complexity for inserting
placeholder pages has gone up.

I've also changed the way I test for a place holder page (from
mm/filemap.c):

static struct address_space placeholder_address_space;
#define PagePlaceHolder(page) ((page)->mapping == &placeholder_address_space)

This is more stable than the last one but I'm just starting to run race
and load testing on it.

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux