On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:31:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > One, rather unfortunate, fact is that struct path is also defined in > > > include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h as something completely different - reiserfs > > > specific. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > reiserfs is being bad. s/path/reiserfs_path/g > > Indeed. That's one pending patch that never got around to be submitted > (and had bitrotten at least 3 times, IIRC). > > ACK, provided that reiserfs folks are OK with the replacement name for > their struct. Note that "path" in question has very little to do with > pathnames - it's a path in balanced tree, IIRC. So if we get around > to renaming that sucker, it might be a good time to pick better name. Aside from having to reindent the reiserfs tree afterwards, I doubt anyone would mind (please cc reiserfs-dev on the patch though). Al is right, it's a path in the balanced tree. -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
