Re: [PATCH 05/22][RFC] Unionfs: Copyup Functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Is BUG the right thing, what do others think? (Using WARN, and set err to
>> something useful?)
> 
>Well, it is definitely a condition which Unionfs doesn't expect - if it
>doesn't know about the type, how could it copy it up?

Other filesystems don't seem to BUG either (at least I have not run into 
that yet) when - for whatever reasons - the statdata of a dentry is 
fubared. `ls`  just displays it then, like

 ?-w---Sr-T 1 root root 4294967295 date fubared_file



Jan Engelhardt
-- 

-- 
VGER BF report: H 0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux