Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 September 2006 17:31:51 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> 
> Yes and no. In the latter case, they have to magically know that at
> least menuconfig and xconfig can be tricked to list depending options.

True.  Marginally better than horrible then. :)

> Could be a fun project [...]

Absolutely.  Assuming that select gets removed in the process, and
concentrating on oldconfig, would it be enough to have something like
this in the .config?

# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE has unmet dependencies: CONFIG_SCSI, CONFIG_BLOCK

Now people looking for usb mass storage can find the option without
grepping through Kconfig files, but also every single driver for every
single disabled subsystem shows up.  Might be a bit too much.

Jörn

-- 
Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent.
-- Sun Tzu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux