Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shaya Potter wrote:
so I'm trying to use unionfs, cachefs and nfs, as cachefs is 2.6.18-rc5 right now, thats what I'm testing, but I hit an oops.

basically unionfs's lookup does a "lookup_one_len()" on the underlying fs.

lookup_one_len() calls __lookup_hash()

__lookup_hash() is called as "__lookup_hash(&this, base, NULL)"

now that NULL is important.  that's the nameidata entry of __lookup_hash()

__lookup_hash() ends up calling the underlying fs's lookup op, i.e. nfs_lookup()

nfs_lookup() calls nfs_reval_fsid(nd->mnt, dir, &fhandle, &fattr);

see the bug? :)

This doesn't seem like a unionfs bug, as one should be able to call lookup_one_len() on an NFS fs.

ok my "fix" is basically that nfs_reval_fsid() uses the nd->mnt to get to mnt->mnt_root.

I basically switched it to take a dentry and I call it as

nfs_reval_fsid(dentry->d_sb->s_root, dir.....)

have no clue if this is correct, but it doesn't oops anymore and seems to "work".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux