Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> - Send fine-grained incremental patches.  It's OK to do complete
>   replacement patchsets when the code is new, but this stuff is supposed to
>   be stabilised.

I thought the code was still officially *new*.

As I understood things from what you said, you delegated responsibility for my
patches on to Trond, who hasn't taken them yet.  He has further delegated
review responsibility on to Christoph, so I've been consolidating my patches
to make it easier for Christoph (or whoever) to do so.

So, as I understand the situation, my patches won't go anywhere until
Christoph ACKs them and Trond takes them into his tree.  If this isn't so,
please clarify the situation.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux