Re: Diff b/w generic_file_read & do_sync_read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 07:11 -0700, UZAIR LAKHANI wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> I want to find out the difference between
> generic_file_read and do_sync_read. The thing I have
> got upto now is that generic_file_read uses the page
> cache for doing read therefore we must implement
> readpage function with generic_file_read. 
> 
> On the other hand do_sync_read uses aio_read function
> for doing read. I want a little bit explanation about
> the difference b/w these two.

There really isn't too much difference between the two.  There is a set
of patches in the -mm kernel that cleans up some of the duplicity and
removes generic_file_read completely:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115214448319794&w=2

Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux