Re: What's the NFS OOM problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday August 15, rheflin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I have noticed on SLES kernels that when the dirty_*ratios turned down it
> still uses alot more memory than it should work writeback buffers, it makes
> me think that with the default setting of 40% that it for some reason
> may be using all of memory and deadlocking.   It does not seem like an
> NFS only issue, as I believe I have duplicated it with a fast lock
> setup.

We seem to have a little patch in SuSE kernels that might be making
the problem worse .... though I presume it was introduced for a
reason.  I haven't managed to track what that reason was yet.

What is "a fast lock setup"??  I don't understand.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux