Hi, On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Roman Zippel wrote: > > If you force everyone to use 64bit sector numbers, I don't understand how > > you can claim "still working just fine on 32bit"? > > 64bit sector numbers work just fine on 32-bit machines. Depends on the definition of "fine". > > At some point ext4 is probably going to be the de facto standard, which very > > many people want to use, because it has all the new features, which won't be > > ported to ext2/3. So I still don't understand, what's so wrong about a > > little tuning in both directions? > > Just seems like wasted effort to me. I disagree. Many developer still brag about how Linux runs on about everything, but it's little steps like this, which make it more and more a joke. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
