Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I haven't seen anyone mentioning it but properly written cleanup programs
> for /tmp et.al. do depend on atimes. When a system crashes after a long
> time then (3) and (4) will probably cause /tmp to be wiped out because
> at the next boot all atimes will be really old.

s-/tmp-/var/tmp-, since you should expect /tmp to be wiped after a reboot
(especially if it's tmpfs).
-- 
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.

http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux