Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Edgar Toernig wrote:


Your implementation is much cruder - it simply takes the fd
away from the app; any future use gives EBADF.  As a bonus,
it works for regular files and even goes as far as destroying
all mappings of the file from all processes (even root processes).
IMVHO this is a disaster from a security and reliability point
of view.


I can see the value in these system calls, but I agree that the implementation is crude. "EBADF" is not something that applications are taught to expect. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I can think of no situation under which a file descriptor currently gets yanked out from under your feet -- you should always have to formally abandon it with close().

This kind of thing only looks proper if it leaves the file descriptor in place and just returns errors / EOF when you attempt to access it.

Thanks,
Chase
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux