On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 15:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:00:15 -0400 > Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The correct lock ordering is inode lock -> BKL > > hm. With CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y we should be getting lockdep warnings and > deadlocks, shouldn't we? I recall seeing reports of neither. hmmmm my mind is half blank at this (no coffee yet) but something tells me the BKL is special cased in lockdep because of it's magic and very undefined semantics...... -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
