On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:18:58PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 04:41:16AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > 2.6.17-912b2539e1e062cec73e2e61448e507f7719bd08 > > > > While trying to remove 2 small files, 2 empty dirs and 1 empty dir on > > xfs partition > > Probably spurious. xfs_ilock can be called on both the parent and child, > which wouldn't be a deadlock. Hmm... they'd be different inodes though, so different lock addresses in memory - is lockdep taking that into account? Would we need to go annotate xfs_ilock somehow to give better hints to the lockdep code? thanks. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
