Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso wrote:
And this is your argument that on-line resizing is a horrible hack,

It's an example of ext2 being bandaided to do something it was never originally designed to do. If online resizing had been planned from the start, allocating new inode tables on the fly would be trivial, as it is in JFS/NTFS/...


and ext3 should be thrown out and rewritten from scratch?

Blatant and silly exaggeration. Re-read the thread, and note how many times "cp -a ext3 ext4" was written.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux