Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> 
> Umm, and how is this fundamentally different from similar code paths in
> the VFS (e.g. O_DIRECT vs regular writes)?

That's a great argument.

You're arguing that your thing is good by pointing to a known disaster 
area and saying "but that other thing does it too, so it must be good".

O_DIRECT is a piece of crap, and I'm still sorry that I didn't push back 
enough on it. And I _did_ push back on it. But I finally was worn down.

And yes, part of the problem is exactly that it uses _almost_ the same 
paths, but not quite. 

Oh, well.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux