Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> 
> It's funny that everyone is arguing to fork ext3 into ext4, for a feature
> that will primarily allow it to work with large disks (that are already
> here, not some wacky pipe dream of featuritis as Jeff thinks).  Yet the
> same people that are advocating code duplication on a massive scale in
> ext4 are against 5 lines of duplication between the VFS and a filesystem,
> or in a couple of drivers here and there.

You haven't actually listened to any of the arguments, have you?

Please remove me from the Cc on this thread. I'm not interested. 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux