Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:
Quite frankly, at this point, there's no way in hell I believe we can do major surgery on ext3. It's the main filesystem for a lot of users, and it's just not worth the instability worries unless it's something very obviously transparent.

I wouldn't mind an ext4 (that hopefully drops some of the features of ext3, and might not downgrade to ext2 on errors, for example).

Certainly agreed, for all of this :)

I think that the lack of ext4 means people keep trying to stuff the wrong things into ext3.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux