Re: Why NFS enforce size limit on readdirplus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 01:54 -0400, Xin Zhao wrote:
> Maybe this question is a little dumb.
> 
> I am wondering why in NFS readdirplus can be used only for directories
> of size less than 8*PAGE_SIZE, otherwise, it will switch to use normal
> readdir?
> 
> In nfs/inode.c, I noticed the following code:
> 			    if (nfs_server_capable(inode, NFS_CAP_READDIRPLUS) &&
> fattr->size <= NFS_LIMIT_READDIRPLUS)
> 				    set_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_FLAGS(inode));
> 
> Can someone kindly explain the reason?

Efficiency: READDIRPLUS requires a lookup for each entry. If there are
too many entries, the whole thing gets really really slow...

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux