Re: [autofs] Re: [NFS] Re: [RFC] Multiple server selection and replicated mount failover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



==> Regarding [autofs] Re: [NFS] Re: [RFC] Multiple server selection and replicated mount failover; Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> adds:

trond.myklebust> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 13:05 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> > 4) How does NFS v4 fit into this picture as I believe that some
>> >    of this functionality is included within the protocol.
>> 
>> And this.
>> 
>> NFS v4 appears quite different so should I be considering this for v2 and 
>> v3 only?

trond.myklebust> NFSv4 has full support for migration/replication in the
trond.myklebust> protocol. If a filesystem fails on a given server, then
trond.myklebust> the server itself will tell the client where it can find
trond.myklebust> the replicas. There should be no need to provide that
trond.myklebust> information at mount time.

And what happens when the server disappears?

-Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux