On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:26:55PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > Compiling at each step is better than not. But my main point is > that it is superfluously broken into multiple patches. This comment is from about a year ago, so it probably has fallen off the radar: At 2005-06-02 14:51:54, Greg K-H wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 07:32:19AM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote: > > What sort of > > logical chunks would you consider to be appropriate? Separate patches > > for each file (inode.c, file.c, super.c, etc.), which represent sets > > of functions for each major VFS object? > > Yes. > > thanks, > > greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
