On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 09:16:34PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > On Monday May 8, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > NACK. As long as we have no HSM support in the tree there's no reason to > > add this. From the kernel's point it's just untested and unused code that > > can break. > > > Greg: you seemed to suggest that there was already code in XFS that > could make use of this. If that is so: could you point us to it > please. It's used by SGI's out of tree dmapi implementation. Because dmapi is such an utterly braindead standard I don't expect anyone to submit a kernel-based implementation for inclusion, although support for a big enough subset of that standard could be archived by proper kernel <-> userspace cooperation. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html