Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Either way, it will use more stack; the mere fact that whilst it's using the
> > value, the compiler may stash it in a register is irrelevant.
> 
> Is the stack usage very close to exceeding 4 KB?  Could saving one more
> pointer on the stack cause a problem?

I suspect you don't know since it's a stacked filesystem.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux