Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Either way, it will use more stack; the mere fact that whilst it's using the > > value, the compiler may stash it in a register is irrelevant. > > Is the stack usage very close to exceeding 4 KB? Could saving one more > pointer on the stack cause a problem? I suspect you don't know since it's a stacked filesystem. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html