Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/4/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static int ecryptfs_statfs(struct super_block *sb, struct kstatfs *buf)
> > +{
> > +     int rc = 0;
> > +
> > +     ecryptfs_printk(KERN_DEBUG, "Enter\n");
> > +     rc = vfs_statfs(ECRYPTFS_SUPERBLOCK_TO_LOWER(sb), buf);
> > +     ecryptfs_printk(KERN_DEBUG, "Exit; rc = [%d]\n", rc);
> > +     return rc;
> > +}
>
> This is ugly. Could you remove the debugging, or at least use dprintk?

On 5/4/06, Michael Thompson <michael.craig.thompson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How would dprintk differ from the current approach with ecryptfs_printk?

Not much, so please just kill the function tracing stuffs. Thanks.

                                          Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux