Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lun 17/04/2006 à 23:32, Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 14:07 -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I ran the same tests on a 16 core EM64T box very similar to the one
> > > you ran
> > > dbench on :). Dbench results on ext3 varies quite a bit.  I couldn't
> > > get 
> > > to a statistically significant conclusion  For eg,
> > 
> > 
> > dbench is not a good performance benchmark. At all. Don't use it for
> > that ;)
> 
> Agreed. (I did not mean to use it in the first place :).  I was just trying 
> to verify the benchmark results posted earlier)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kiran

What is the good performance benchmark to know if we should use atomic_t
instead of percpu_counter ?

Regards,
Laurent
-- 
Laurent Vivier
Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM)
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux