Le lun 17/04/2006 à 23:32, Ravikiran G Thirumalai a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:09:36PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 14:07 -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > > > > > > > > I ran the same tests on a 16 core EM64T box very similar to the one > > > you ran > > > dbench on :). Dbench results on ext3 varies quite a bit. I couldn't > > > get > > > to a statistically significant conclusion For eg, > > > > > > dbench is not a good performance benchmark. At all. Don't use it for > > that ;) > > Agreed. (I did not mean to use it in the first place :). I was just trying > to verify the benchmark results posted earlier) > > Thanks, > Kiran What is the good performance benchmark to know if we should use atomic_t instead of percpu_counter ? Regards, Laurent -- Laurent Vivier Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM) http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
