--- Avishay Traeger <atraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 01:32 -0800, UZAIR LAKHANI > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I want to enquire about the percent overhead > involved > > when we use Wrapfs(null layer stacking file > system) > > over ext3. > > It should only be a few percent (if I remember > correctly, less than 5), > but it would depend on your machine and workload. > If you want an exact > answer, just run some benchmarks on ext3 and > wrapfs/ext3. > > > I want to enquire this because I want to use > Wrapfs in > > a network environment and there will be an > additional > > overhead of network communication. > > If you're still talking about implementing NFS using > stackable file > systems, please note that we decided that was not a > good idea. Thanks for replying but consider this scenario. What Wrapfs code do is this user_request ---> vfs_request ---> wrapfs_request ---> actual_fs_request ---> storage Now consider this scenario in a network environment (client machine) user_request ---> vfs_request ---> wrapfs_request ---> Network ---> (server machine)actual_fs_request ---> storage The network here gets client requests and send them to server and vice versa. > > Good luck. > > Avishay Traeger > http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/~avishay/ > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html