On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > The help text says that if you select CONFIG_LBD, then it will > automatically select CONFIG_LFS. Nope... That isn't currently the > case. I'm not sure your patch makes anything much better, though. Why does CONFIG_LSF exist in the first place? Afaik, it only affects a totally not-very-interesting thing (blkcnt_t) for a totally not very interesting feature (the number of people who want single files >2TB is likely not very big). Having it auto-selected by LBD sounds insane, since LBD is likely more interesting than LSF itsef is. It would make more sense to go the other way (have LSF auto-select LBD). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
