From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Update the KDF contexts to match those actually used on SM8650. This turns out to be needed for the hardware-wrapped key tests generic/368 and generic/369 to pass on the SM8650 HDK (now that I have one to actually test it). Apparently the contexts changed between the prototype version I tested a couple years ago and the final version. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c b/src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c index 4dde1d4a..f51b3669 100644 --- a/src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c +++ b/src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c @@ -2278,21 +2278,21 @@ static void hw_kdf(const u8 *master_key, size_t master_key_size, static void derive_inline_encryption_key(const u8 *master_key, size_t master_key_size, u8 inlinecrypt_key[INLINECRYPT_KEY_SIZE]) { static const u8 ctx[36] = - "inline encryption key\0\0\0\0\0\0\x03\x43\0\x82\x50\0\0\0\0"; + "inline encryption key\0\0\0\0\0\0\x02\x43\0\x82\x50\0\0\0\0"; hw_kdf(master_key, master_key_size, ctx, sizeof(ctx), inlinecrypt_key, INLINECRYPT_KEY_SIZE); } static void derive_sw_secret(const u8 *master_key, size_t master_key_size, u8 sw_secret[SW_SECRET_SIZE]) { static const u8 ctx[28] = - "raw secret\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x03\x17\0\x80\x50\0\0\0\0"; + "raw secret\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\x02\x17\0\x80\x50\0\0\0\0"; hw_kdf(master_key, master_key_size, ctx, sizeof(ctx), sw_secret, SW_SECRET_SIZE); } base-commit: dec8cfb46ba0f19d29d13412841f68ebf119a452 -- 2.48.1