On 2/2/2024 10:51 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30 2024 at 5:37P -0500, Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The device-mapper has a flag to mark targets as singleton, which is a required flag for immutable targets. Without this flag, multiple dm-verity targets can be added to a mapped device, which has no practical use cases and will let dm_table_get_immutable_target return NULL. This patch adds the missing flag, restricting only one dm-verity target per mapped device. Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v1-v10: + Not present v11: + Introduced v12: + No changes --- drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c index 14e58ae70521..66a850c02be4 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int dm_verity_get_root_digest(struct dm_target *ti, u8 **root_digest, unsigned istatic struct target_type verity_target = {.name = "verity", - .features = DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE, + .features = DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE, .version = {1, 9, 0}, .module = THIS_MODULE, .ctr = verity_ctr, -- 2.43.0It is true this change will cause dm_table_get_immutable_target() to not return NULL, but: I'm curious how that is meaningful in the context of dm-verity? (given the only caller of dm_table_get_immutable_target() is request-based DM code in DM core.) Thanks, Mike
Sorry for the confusion. The reference of dm_table_get_immutable_target() is only to justify an immutable target should also be a singleton(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/md/dm-table.c#n982). It is not directly related to dm-verity.
In the context of dm-verity. I found although veritysetup does ensure the dm-verity target as a singleton, users can still use dmsetup to configure multiple dm-verity targets within a single map table. This leads to a situation where only the first target can be accessed. Therefore to prevent this and similar misuse, I propose introducing DM_TARGET_SINGLETON to allow the kernel to enforce dm-verity targets as singletons.
Thanks, Fan
![]() |