On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:26:05PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I noticed we don't run fsstress with fscrypt in any of our tests, and > this was helpful in uncovering a couple of symlink related corner cases > for the btrfs support work. Add a basic test that creates a encrypted > directory and runs fsstress in that directory. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/generic/736 | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/generic/736.out | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/generic/736 > create mode 100644 tests/generic/736.out This might be worth adding, but the way this sort of thing is tested on other filesystems is through implementing the test_dummy_encryption mount option and then doing a full run of xfstests with test_dummy_encryption enabled. That's more comprehensive than just running fsstress. - Eric
|