Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] crypto: LEA block cipher implementation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Dongsoo Lee <letrhee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] crypto: LEA block cipher implementation
- From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 21:53:52 -0700
- In-reply-to: <000001d9d3b8$bca8e9d0$35fabd70$@nsr.re.kr>
- References: <20230630050323.984216-1-letrhee@nsr.re.kr> <000001d9d3b8$bca8e9d0$35fabd70$@nsr.re.kr>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 07:50:37AM +0900, Dongsoo Lee wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is there any further progress on the patch we submitted and the additional fscrypt documentation?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20230630064811.22569-1-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u.
>
> If the LEA cipher is accepted, we would like to add a SIMD implementation for it.
I already applied 'fscrypt: improve the "Encryption modes and usage" section'
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630064811.22569-2-ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx) for 6.6.
I don't object to the fscrypt support for LEA, but I'm not going to apply it
until the crypto API support is accepted.
- Eric
[Index of Archives]
[linux Cryptography]
[Asterisk App Development]
[PJ SIP]
[Gnu Gatekeeper]
[IETF Sipping]
[Info Cyrus]
[ALSA User]
[Fedora Linux Users]
[Linux SCTP]
[DCCP]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[Deep Creek Hot Springs]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[ISDN Cause Codes]