On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote: > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > In order to store encryption information for directories, symlinks, > etc., fscrypt stores a context item with each encrypted non-regular > inode. fscrypt provides an arbitrary blob for the filesystem to store, > and it does not clearly fit into an existing structure, so this goes in > a new item type. > > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/btrfs/fscrypt.h | 2 + > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 19 +++++ > fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 8 ++- > include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 10 +++ > 5 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c b/fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c > index 3a53dc59c1e4..d09d42210f37 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/fscrypt.c > @@ -1,8 +1,126 @@ > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +#include <linux/iversion.h> > #include "ctree.h" > +#include "accessors.h" > +#include "btrfs_inode.h" > +#include "disk-io.h" > +#include "fs.h" > #include "fscrypt.h" > +#include "ioctl.h" > +#include "messages.h" > +#include "transaction.h" > +#include "xattr.h" > + > +static int btrfs_fscrypt_get_context(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, size_t len) > +{ > + struct btrfs_key key = { > + .objectid = btrfs_ino(BTRFS_I(inode)), > + .type = BTRFS_FSCRYPT_CTX_ITEM_KEY, > + .offset = 0, > + }; > + struct btrfs_path *path; > + struct extent_buffer *leaf; > + unsigned long ptr; > + int ret; > + > + > + path = btrfs_alloc_path(); > + if (!path) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, BTRFS_I(inode)->root, &key, path, 0, 0); > + if (ret) { > + len = -ENOENT; > + goto out; > + } > + > + leaf = path->nodes[0]; > + ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, path->slots[0]); > + /* fscrypt provides max context length, but it could be less */ > + len = min_t(size_t, len, btrfs_item_size(leaf, path->slots[0])); > + read_extent_buffer(leaf, ctx, ptr, len); > + > +out: > + btrfs_free_path(path); > + return len; > +} > + > +static void btrfs_fscrypt_update_context(struct btrfs_path *path, > + const void *ctx, size_t len) > +{ > + struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0]; > + unsigned long ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, path->slots[0]); > + > + len = min_t(size_t, len, btrfs_item_size(leaf, path->slots[0])); > + write_extent_buffer(leaf, ctx, ptr, len); > + btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf); > +} > + > +static int btrfs_fscrypt_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, > + size_t len, void *fs_data) > +{ > + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans = fs_data; > + struct btrfs_key key = { > + .objectid = btrfs_ino(BTRFS_I(inode)), > + .type = BTRFS_FSCRYPT_CTX_ITEM_KEY, > + .offset = 0, > + }; > + struct btrfs_path *path; > + int ret; > + > + path = btrfs_alloc_path(); > + if (!path) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + if (!trans) > + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(BTRFS_I(inode)->root, 1); This doesn't appear to be called without a trans, so this whole !trans case can be eliminated. Additionally it doesn't appear the inode context will exist ever, so you can just unconditionally insert the empty item and update it. Thanks, Josef