On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 10:46 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Thanks, Eric. I really like your suggestion. Currently, type is > > defined as either "ima" or "verity". Are you ok with prefixing each > > record with these strings? > > > > As I mentioned before I think "full_hash" would be more descriptive than "ima". > (All of this is part of IMA.) It's up to you though. Sorry, to me that doesn't sense. Either we use "full_hash" and "Merkle-tree", or "ima" and "verity". -- thanks, Mimi
|