Re: [PATCH] generic/395: remove workarounds for wrong error codes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/395: remove workarounds for wrong error codes
- From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:41:36 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20201109234051.GC853@sol.localdomain>
- References: <20201031054018.695314-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20201031173439.GA1750809@mit.edu> <20201031181048.GA936@sol.localdomain> <20201109234051.GC853@sol.localdomain>
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:40:51PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> I ended up backporting some of the missing patches to some of the LTS kernels.
>
> Now the status of the "encrypt" group tests is:
>
> 5.10-rc3: all pass, but generic/602 is flaky on ext4, which will be fixed by
> https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20201109231151.GB853@sol.localdomain
>
> 5.4: all pass.
>
Correction: there are two more test failures on upstream and on 5.4.
generic/580 fails on f2fs due to the lazytime bug
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306004555.GB225345@xxxxxxxxx), and generic/595
fails on ubifs due to a longstanding race condition where a file can be created
using a negative "no-key" dentry. I'm planning to fix these.
- Eric
[Index of Archives]
[linux Cryptography]
[Asterisk App Development]
[PJ SIP]
[Gnu Gatekeeper]
[IETF Sipping]
[Info Cyrus]
[ALSA User]
[Fedora Linux Users]
[Linux SCTP]
[DCCP]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[Deep Creek Hot Springs]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[ISDN Cause Codes]