Re: version/tags for fsverity-utils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking at fsverity for Fedora CoreOS (a bit more background in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1959 )
> I have a bunch of questions there (feel free to jump in), but just to start here: 
> 
> I'd like to get fsverity-utils as a Fedora package, but there don't seem to be any git tags on the repo https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/fsverity-utils.git/  - I could make up a datestamped version number, but I think it'd be better if there were upstream tags - it is useful to have releases with human-consumable version numbers for the usual reasons. And RPM/dpkg/etc really care about the version numbers of packages.
> 
> Other distributions/some packagers think "release" means tarballs, so someone may want to consider that too, personally 
> I use https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag for making git tags since I think it helps replace tarballs.

Yes, I think it's time for a formal release of fsverity-utils now that fs-verity
is in the upstream kernel.  I've tagged v1.0 and uploaded the tarball to here:
https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ebiggers/fsverity-utils/v1.0/

- Eric



[Index of Archives]     [linux Cryptography]     [Asterisk App Development]     [PJ SIP]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [IETF Sipping]     [Info Cyrus]     [ALSA User]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [ISDN Cause Codes]

  Powered by Linux