Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] fpga: dfl: factor out feature data creation from build_info_commit_dev()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:34:27PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Add a separate function binfo_create_feature_dev_data() which allocates
> and populates the feature platform data, and call the function from
> build_info_commit_dev() which registers the feature platform device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> index 4c79d433d216..e644eb9fde39 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> @@ -749,12 +749,8 @@ static void dfl_fpga_cdev_add_port_data(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev,
>  	mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * register current feature device, it is called when we need to switch to
> - * another feature parsing or we have parsed all features on given device
> - * feature list.
> - */
> -static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +static struct dfl_feature_platform_data *
> +binfo_create_feature_dev_data(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *fdev = binfo->feature_dev;
>  	struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata;
> @@ -764,7 +760,7 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  
>  	type = feature_dev_id_type(fdev);
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(type >= DFL_ID_MAX))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * we do not need to care for the memory which is associated with
> @@ -774,7 +770,7 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  	 */
>  	pdata = kzalloc(struct_size(pdata, features, binfo->feature_num), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pdata)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	pdata->dev = fdev;
>  	pdata->num = binfo->feature_num;
> @@ -799,7 +795,7 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  	fdev->resource = kcalloc(binfo->feature_num, sizeof(*fdev->resource),
>  				 GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!fdev->resource)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	/* fill features and resource information for feature dev */
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(finfo, p, &binfo->sub_features, node) {
> @@ -818,7 +814,7 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  						       finfo->params, finfo->param_size,
>  						       GFP_KERNEL);
>  			if (!feature->params)
> -				return -ENOMEM;
> +				return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  			feature->param_size = finfo->param_size;
>  		}
> @@ -834,8 +830,10 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
>  			feature->ioaddr =
>  				devm_ioremap_resource(binfo->dev,
>  						      &finfo->mmio_res);
> -			if (IS_ERR(feature->ioaddr))
> -				return PTR_ERR(feature->ioaddr);
> +			if (IS_ERR(feature->ioaddr)) {
> +				ret = PTR_ERR(feature->ioaddr);
> +				return ERR_PTR(ret);

Why change the type back and forth?

  return feature->ioaddr;

is it OK?

Thanks,
Yilun




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux