Re: [PATCH 1/3] fpga: bridge: make fpga_bridge_class a static const structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/23 07:09, Xu Yilun wrote:
On 2023-08-10 at 21:22:08 +0400, Ivan Orlov wrote:
Now that the driver core allows for struct class to be in read-only
memory, move the fpga_bridge_class structure to be declared at build
time placing it into read-only memory, instead of having to be
dynamically allocated at boot time.

Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
index a6c25dee9cc1..6e38ddaf16cf 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
static DEFINE_IDA(fpga_bridge_ida);
-static struct class *fpga_bridge_class;

Could we still use the forward declaration, to avoid moving too
much code block.

/* Lock for adding/removing bridges to linked lists*/
  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bridge_list_lock);
@@ -84,6 +83,53 @@ static struct fpga_bridge *__fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
  	return ERR_PTR(ret);
  }
+static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev,
+			 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", bridge->name);
+}
+
+static ssize_t state_show(struct device *dev,
+			  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
+	int state = 1;
+
+	if (bridge->br_ops && bridge->br_ops->enable_show) {
+		state = bridge->br_ops->enable_show(bridge);
+		if (state < 0)
+			return state;
+	}
+
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", state ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(state);
+
+static struct attribute *fpga_bridge_attrs[] = {
+	&dev_attr_name.attr,
+	&dev_attr_state.attr,
+	NULL,
+};
+ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fpga_bridge);
+
+static void fpga_bridge_dev_release(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
+
+	ida_free(&fpga_bridge_ida, bridge->dev.id);
+	kfree(bridge);
+}
+
+static const struct class fpga_bridge_class = {
+	.name = "fpga_bridge",
+	.dev_groups = fpga_bridge_groups,
+	.dev_release = fpga_bridge_dev_release,
+};

Insert them between __fpga_bridge_get() and of_fpga_bridge_get() is not
preferred. See below comments.

+
  /**
   * of_fpga_bridge_get - get an exclusive reference to an fpga bridge
   *
@@ -99,7 +145,7 @@ struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *np,
  {
  	struct device *dev;
- dev = class_find_device_by_of_node(fpga_bridge_class, np);
+	dev = class_find_device_by_of_node(&fpga_bridge_class, np);
  	if (!dev)
  		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
@@ -126,7 +172,7 @@ struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
  {
  	struct device *bridge_dev;
- bridge_dev = class_find_device(fpga_bridge_class, NULL, dev,
+	bridge_dev = class_find_device(&fpga_bridge_class, NULL, dev,
  				       fpga_bridge_dev_match);
  	if (!bridge_dev)
  		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
@@ -281,39 +327,6 @@ int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device *dev,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_get_to_list);
-static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev,
-			 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
-{
-	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
-
-	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", bridge->name);
-}
-
-static ssize_t state_show(struct device *dev,
-			  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
-{
-	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
-	int state = 1;
-
-	if (bridge->br_ops && bridge->br_ops->enable_show) {
-		state = bridge->br_ops->enable_show(bridge);
-		if (state < 0)
-			return state;
-	}
-
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", state ? "enabled" : "disabled");
-}
-
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name);
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(state);
-
-static struct attribute *fpga_bridge_attrs[] = {
-	&dev_attr_name.attr,
-	&dev_attr_state.attr,
-	NULL,
-};
-ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(fpga_bridge);
-
  /**
   * fpga_bridge_register - create and register an FPGA Bridge device
   * @parent:	FPGA bridge device from pdev
@@ -359,7 +372,7 @@ fpga_bridge_register(struct device *parent, const char *name,
  	bridge->priv = priv;
bridge->dev.groups = br_ops->groups;
-	bridge->dev.class = fpga_bridge_class;
+	bridge->dev.class = &fpga_bridge_class;
  	bridge->dev.parent = parent;
  	bridge->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
  	bridge->dev.id = id;
@@ -407,29 +420,14 @@ void fpga_bridge_unregister(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_unregister);
-static void fpga_bridge_dev_release(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
-
-	ida_free(&fpga_bridge_ida, bridge->dev.id);
-	kfree(bridge);
-}
-

How about put the fpga_bridge_class definition here?

Thanks,
Yilun

Hi Yilun,

Thank you for the review, I agree that forward declaration is better in this case. I'll send you the V2 after making suggested changes.

--
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux