On Fri, 11 Nov 2022, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On 2022-11-08 at 16:43:03 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > +static int pmci_probe(struct dfl_device *ddev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &ddev->dev;
> > + struct pmci_device *pmci;
> > +
> > + pmci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmci), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pmci)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + pmci->m10bmc.dev = dev;
> > + pmci->dev = dev;
>
> I don't see its usage.
It's used by dev_err() in patch 11/12.
> > + pmci->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &ddev->mmio_res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pmci->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pmci->base);
> > +
> > + pmci->m10bmc.regmap =
> > + devm_regmap_init_indirect(dev,
> > + pmci->base + M10BMC_PMCI_INDIRECT_BASE,
> > + &m10bmc_pmci_regmap_config);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pmci->m10bmc.regmap))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pmci->m10bmc.regmap);
> > +
> > + return m10bmc_dev_init(&pmci->m10bmc, &m10bmc_m10_n6000);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_ID_PMCI_BMC 0x12
> > +
> > +static const struct dfl_device_id pmci_ids[] = {
> > + { FME_ID, FME_FEATURE_ID_PMCI_BMC },
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dfl, pmci_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct dfl_driver pmci_driver = {
> > + .drv = {
> > + .name = "intel-m10-bmc",
> > + .dev_groups = m10bmc_dev_groups,
> > + },
> > + .id_table = pmci_ids,
> > + .probe = pmci_probe,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_dfl_driver(pmci_driver);
>
> Maybe change the name. This is still a MAX10 bmc driver, pmci is just the
> interface to max10.
I've now improved the naming consistency to basically have m10bmc_pmci_
as the prefix for many things that weren't previously.
--
i.
