On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 10:34:07AM -0700, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 02:37:32PM -0700, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
> > This one tends to be expanded in the future, so I would keep it switch case.
>
> I'm okay with using the switch statement, but how about the following?
>
> switch (FIELD_GET(DFH_VERSION, readq(base))) {
> case 1:
> ...
> break;
> }
Fine to me.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
